I had a new boiler, cylinder and UPS3 15 50/65 pump fitted last year.
The plumbers left the pump on constant curve III, which according to the pump curves takes up to 60W. I changed to constant curve I which according to the pump curves takes up to 28W, saving about 32 W. I do not know how many hours my pump runs but assuming 3,000 hours/year, with electricity at 37.653 p/kWh from April, the saving could be about £36 per year or potentially £360 if the pump lasts 10 years.
The electricity consumed by the pump isn’t entirely wasted because it will contribute to heating although the price of electricity is about 5 times that of gas.
I have no idea what pump setting you would need. My boiler is 15 kW and needs only about 655 l/h for a 20 K ΔT. If you need a higher setting the savings will be less, if any, with the UPS3 15 50/65.
The Screwfix prices are £119.98 for the UPS3 15-50/65 and £131.49 for the ALPHA 1 15-50/60. According to the pump curves the ALPHA1 15-50/60 130 takes a maximum of 34 W compared to a maximum of 60 W for the UPS3. After 1,200 running hours the ALPHA1 could have saved the price difference of £11.51.
I doubt that the DHW cylinder pump running hours are sufficient to make upgrade worthwhile.
This is just my opinion.