Was just thinking about ways of monitoring heating system efficiency and the effect of different ways of using the house, what doors and windows are open at what times and the effect of various weather on gas consumption. We can do it for electricity at a household level, but it's fairly obvious how to save electric. The solutions to reducing heat losses are not so obvious except for the very obvious one of not heating at all.
Unfortunately, since the gas cooker is used extensively, the gas meter is not a wholly valid way of measuring gas consumption as you cannot know how much has gone through the boiler. In fairness, the cooker does release some heat into the room... but, if nothing else, the fact that the gas meter is outside means it is not a practical point of measurement.
It has occurred to me that measuring boiler firing time would have a near-perfect correlation with heat input (on an old boiler that cannot modulate).
But the simple way I can think of doing this would be to piggy-back a run-hour meter off the boiler gas valve switched live which could be accessed without removing the combustion casing (which would essentially impose an additional load on the boiler circuitry, albeit minimal, and could therefore possibly (?) count as a boiler modification even though you would not actually be changing the boiler control method in any way).
A clamp-type ammeter around the gas valve switched live could be used instead. This could be one of the early electrical energy use monitors that pre-dated smart meters. This way all you would be doing would be measuring electrical current flow to the gas valve and the energy use monitor would give a reading in watthours that could be used to calculate run hours. This might be too bulky to be able to fit.
Finally, if there were some way of logging the blue flame through the peep-hole on the front of the boiler casing, that would give a run-hour reading. Perhaps a light dependent resistor switched transister circuit connected to a battery power source and switching a relay to run a runhour meter. Bulky and messy though.
The first one would be neater, simpler, less complicated and reliable. But would it be legal?
Or has someone got any clever idea that is neat and clean and that I've not thought of?
Unfortunately, since the gas cooker is used extensively, the gas meter is not a wholly valid way of measuring gas consumption as you cannot know how much has gone through the boiler. In fairness, the cooker does release some heat into the room... but, if nothing else, the fact that the gas meter is outside means it is not a practical point of measurement.
It has occurred to me that measuring boiler firing time would have a near-perfect correlation with heat input (on an old boiler that cannot modulate).
But the simple way I can think of doing this would be to piggy-back a run-hour meter off the boiler gas valve switched live which could be accessed without removing the combustion casing (which would essentially impose an additional load on the boiler circuitry, albeit minimal, and could therefore possibly (?) count as a boiler modification even though you would not actually be changing the boiler control method in any way).
A clamp-type ammeter around the gas valve switched live could be used instead. This could be one of the early electrical energy use monitors that pre-dated smart meters. This way all you would be doing would be measuring electrical current flow to the gas valve and the energy use monitor would give a reading in watthours that could be used to calculate run hours. This might be too bulky to be able to fit.
Finally, if there were some way of logging the blue flame through the peep-hole on the front of the boiler casing, that would give a run-hour reading. Perhaps a light dependent resistor switched transister circuit connected to a battery power source and switching a relay to run a runhour meter. Bulky and messy though.
The first one would be neater, simpler, less complicated and reliable. But would it be legal?
Or has someone got any clever idea that is neat and clean and that I've not thought of?