I've got a mid-terrace property at around 18 deg in the morning at the moment, without heating overnight. It's probably not an accurate thermometer as there's another showing 15 deg. But we're only interested in the temp rise and this property has wall and loft insulation. I didn't do a heat loss calculation but you can see already it's going to be very low.
Is it cheaper to warm this house with a short burst of heating or on low heating for a few hours?
There are massive, oversized rads in the house. It's a 2 bed btw. With a short burst of high heat, it takes about 10 min to warm up and can be turned off 30 min after switching on. Something like 18 to 21 deg in 30 min. Stays warm for a few hours.
For low heating, I've turned down the boiler output to 20% (from 24kW although min heating is supposed to be 9kW) and flow temp to 45 deg. Return temp is 40 deg. It takes 1 hr+ to get to 21 deg. The boiler can run for much longer as the thermostat doesn't switch it off immediately but the temperature also takes much longer to keep rising past 21 deg, probably due to the low flow temp.
At 80 deg flow temp and boiler at full power, the 21 deg often gets overshot and reaches 22.
Good practice is to run the boiler for a long time at low heat but I don't think this is possible here given min output is 9 kW.
I once saw the calculations and modelling that were used to prove that it's cheaper to keep a house warm than to heat it from cold. I don't remember the exact numbers but the temperatures used were quite low.
My point is that this is just modelling - wouldn't the conclusions only apply to the model used (temperatures, boiler, type of house, insulation, etc)?
In the example I've given, I've provided a lot of vague numbers. I suppose the only way to find out accurately would be to heat the house in short bursts for a day or two and record gas usage, then repeat with heating on low and compare?
Is it cheaper to warm this house with a short burst of heating or on low heating for a few hours?
There are massive, oversized rads in the house. It's a 2 bed btw. With a short burst of high heat, it takes about 10 min to warm up and can be turned off 30 min after switching on. Something like 18 to 21 deg in 30 min. Stays warm for a few hours.
For low heating, I've turned down the boiler output to 20% (from 24kW although min heating is supposed to be 9kW) and flow temp to 45 deg. Return temp is 40 deg. It takes 1 hr+ to get to 21 deg. The boiler can run for much longer as the thermostat doesn't switch it off immediately but the temperature also takes much longer to keep rising past 21 deg, probably due to the low flow temp.
At 80 deg flow temp and boiler at full power, the 21 deg often gets overshot and reaches 22.
Good practice is to run the boiler for a long time at low heat but I don't think this is possible here given min output is 9 kW.
I once saw the calculations and modelling that were used to prove that it's cheaper to keep a house warm than to heat it from cold. I don't remember the exact numbers but the temperatures used were quite low.
My point is that this is just modelling - wouldn't the conclusions only apply to the model used (temperatures, boiler, type of house, insulation, etc)?
In the example I've given, I've provided a lot of vague numbers. I suppose the only way to find out accurately would be to heat the house in short bursts for a day or two and record gas usage, then repeat with heating on low and compare?