Search the forum,

Discuss Whole house underfloor heating as only heat source. Yes or No? in the Plumbing Jobs | The Job-board area at PlumbersForums.net

Status
Not open for further replies.
D

dazboj

I'm having a full house refurb and extensions built and had always been keen to have underfloor heating and no radiators. We don't have any plans for a fire or burner either.

Does anyone have any experience living solely with UFH?
Would you recommend it or should I maybe go with UFH for the large kitchen diner and rads in the bedrooms?
I estimate the house to end up approximately 220m2. How many thousands do think I should put aside for something of this scale.

Thanks
 
Thanks guys. I think I've decided to drop the whole house idea.
I'll probably go for upstairs in 2 bathrooms, and downstairs everywhere except living room as I'd rather have a nice thick pile carpet.
 
I'm having a full house refurb and extensions built and had always been keen to have underfloor heating and no radiators. We don't have any plans for a fire or burner either.

Does anyone have any experience living solely with UFH?
Would you recommend it or should I maybe go with UFH for the large kitchen diner and rads in the bedrooms?
I estimate the house to end up approximately 220m2. How many thousands do think I should put aside for something of this scale.

Thanks

Underfloor heating is perfect for a full house
As long as the calcs work out
House needs to be thermal efficient
And a liquid screed is a very good option
 
UFH throughout - it is suitable floor all floor types / coverings. Much reduced running cost, no rads on walls (other than bathroom towel rails) - no issue with it in bedrooms. Far more comfortable & far easier to control.
 
Absolutely. You can still have your carpet in bedrooms. Carpet companies not have tog ratings for their carpets and underlays. much nicer than unslightly radiators
 
Absolute waste of money in bedrooms.

Why the need for peak or background heating in a room that is either unoccupied or you are wrapped in a 13.5 tog quilt.

Money to burn then crack on. Failing that then rads on a seperate zone for the bedrooms.
 
With those old Victorian properties the first problem you'll have is the insulation. The floors and walls need to be very good insulated otherwise you will have too much heat loss / basically you'd heat for nothing. Like Simon said already is no point of having ufh in bedrooms. Bathrooms and big kitchen are great.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Reply to Whole house underfloor heating as only heat source. Yes or No? in the Plumbing Jobs | The Job-board area at PlumbersForums.net

Similar plumbing topics

Hi all! So yes, Richter level 7 earthquake at least. I need to plan an underfloor heating for a 4x4 expedition/overlanding off-road vehicle, and...
Replies
10
Views
1K
Hi, we had UFH installed dowstairs in our house recently, and I'm not 100% sure that it's connected correctly. I'd be grateful if someone could...
Replies
7
Views
1K
N
We have a weird 'dual' system in our 2 floor house we just rented out - meaning that the ground floor has an underfloor system and the top floor...
Replies
2
Views
983
Hi everyone, I moved into a new build three bedroom, two bathroom bungalow about 2.5 years ago. Ever since we moved in there has been an issue...
Replies
70
Views
5K
Hi, I have 5 bed house with underfloor heating on all 3 floors.I also have converted attic. UFH was installed in year 2000. I want to put low...
Replies
4
Views
1K
Creating content since 2001. Untold Media.

Newest Plumbing Threads

Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock