Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Welcome to the forum. Although you can post in any forum, the USA forum is here in case of local regs or laws

Jun 20, 2023
3
0
1
Scotland
Member Type
DIY or Homeowner
Hi everyone đź‘‹

I am getting a secondary rad put in under our windows. The first one is a double panel with fins. This is to try and boost a little as room gets slightly chilly in winter. I've looked at the calcs online, and I think a single panel with fins, type 11, should do the trick. I thought the type 11 is better because it'll not stick out as much.

Anyway. My question is then how wide should I go for aesthetics. The 300 X 1400 has been suggested, as it'll align neatly with the middle window. But I notice there is a 300 X 2000 option in this range.

What do you think visually looks best? I don't want it to dominate, but then I also don't want it looking pokey
 

Attachments

  • IMG-20230620-WA0004.jpg
    IMG-20230620-WA0004.jpg
    541 KB · Views: 93
  • IMG-20230620-WA0003.jpg
    IMG-20230620-WA0003.jpg
    519.2 KB · Views: 63
Thank you ShaunC - I think I might go for the type 21 1400 wide. Good to know that about the type 11. A family member straight away recommended I get a type 10, no fins... He said it'd be cheaper to run and flush to the wall. The plumber said 21 or 22, although I think 22 probably is too much. The room is 3.2 by 4.6 roughly speaking, so not huge but equally not tiny
 
One plumber suggested getting a Stelrad 450 X 1600 K2 and then replacing the existing 600 X 1200 P+ with a smaller Stelrad 600 X 600 as boost.

The other plumber suggested adding the 300 x 1400 (from VictorianPlumbing), type 11 although at my direction. They would install other products as needed.
 

Official Sponsors of Plumbers Talk

We recommend City Plumbing Supplies, BES, and Plumbing Superstore for all plumbing supplies.