Proximity of flue

[Polly]

Thanks oz. I've been on to the gas safe people who confirmed the guidance, but the guy I spoke to didn't know if the shared path had a bearing on the matter. I think I need to get back on to them. My view is that the guidelines are there to consider neighbouring properties, so would affect the neighbours the same way, whoever uses the path.

Cheers

 

[Polly]

Thanks jimbob. Opinions are mixed, it would bother some & not others. I don't think the pic conveys it well.

i don't know if the regs are enforceable regulations or merely guidelines. I understand the flue at a lower level as this is needs an even further distance from the boundary, 2.5, which takes the boundary well into my garden.i'm going to get back onto gas safe.

All of this could have been avoided if the flue had been vented through the roof. The extension was a new build, so I would have thought easy to do.

cheers

 

[oz-plumber]

Hi Polly,
The regulations would be to the property boundary.
If the flue isn't installed as per regulations then it must be altered.

I have doubts on whether a shared pathway would come into the regulations.

Is the shared pathway on the house / building plans or is it just an accepted thing.
In laymans terms - is it common property?

 

[buckley plumb]

guidance shows 2.1m above paths and 2.5m from a neighbours boundary if a nusance but this can be reduced with a plume kit page 11 .http://www.idhee.org.uk/ExceptionsGuide.pdf

 

[Dotty]

I don't see why any of the guys on here should be brought into this petty squabble.

Maybe not. There's no need to be insulting though. Better to ignore the thread than go down the route other forums are happy to promote.

You want us to get that rap? I don't.

 

[Polly]

Thanks buck. The flue is .32 from the boundary. The path is the boundary, but is not owned by me. The path is my only access to my property, & the flue property has a right of way so that they can access the rear of their property.

the flue is 2.1m high, and is less than 2m from my garden.
Do you know if these rules are strictly enforceable or merely guidelines that can be ignored?

Thanks, appreciate your response

 

[buckley plumb]

Thanks buck. The flue is .32 from the boundary. The path is the boundary, but is not owned by me. The path is my only access to my property, & the flue property has a right of way so that they can access the rear of their property.

the flue is 2.1m high, and is less than 2m from my garden.
Do you know if these rules are strictly enforceable or merely guidelines that can be ignored?

Thanks, appreciate your response

according to the guide it should be 2.5m but manufacturers normaly state 600mm .so its not so clear cut one rule overrides another so it can get complicated. I cant see a real problem with the install apart from the plume annoying you. if I was you I would aproacvh the neighbour and ask if the would fit a plume kit or plume re direction end - if the boiler is a Worcester this option is built in and the end can be twisted as stated on a previous post to 45 degrees . disputes like this are best sought out if possible with the neighbour before involving building regs . the engineer who fitted the boiler may even come back to redirect flue if approached.hope this helps

 

[SimonG]

Hi Simon. Do you think the regs have been breached?

No, I don't. You say it's a shared path, who owns it?

 

[Polly]

The house on the other side to me (the other side of the flue house). I am land locked without it, the flue house has a right of way if they need to access the rear of the property.

it does seem to have breached the rules.

 

[lame plumber]

time to be realistic here peeps. the extention is built, building regs have probably been involved and signed it off. the path is owned by the extention builder and the op has right of access along it. the flue is high enough not to cause a problem, its only steam you can see and only if you stand on a stool in front of it for quite a while can it have a detremental effect. Gas safe arent going to be worried as its safe iaw their regs, if buildings control have passed it they are unlikely to back track. Sometimes you just have to take a big old chill pill and get on with life. I have people park across my driveway, its aggrevating but you can either live with it, pick a fight and win or pick a fight and get a beating, which isnt going to improve your life any further. chances are if you kick off with the neighbours your life isnt going to get any better and it would seem your main bugbear is the fact someone has built an extention, time to look the other way and get on with life, as you wont win this one.

 

[EPH]

What have he neighbours said when you approached them about the flue?

 

[lame plumber]

have a read of Polly's posts, she doesnt like the overbearing extension and thats the real problem!

 

[Polly]

Quite right lame, I don't like the extension.

Nevertheless, the rule requiring the flue to be .6m from the boundary has been breached, as has the rule requiring a low level flue to be 2.5m from the boundary. When the wind is blowing in the right direction, I will be walking through the steam.

 

[Ermintrude]

6m from boundary? Wtf? I'm in trouble fitted 1000's much closer than 6m

 

[stevetheplumber]

Point six

 

[Polly]

Hi.
Not much. Not interested. They don't have much if any regard or consideration for me or other neighbours, but I'm the one most affected.

 

[lame plumber]

you fuss to much, flat below my house has a flue by the back door at shoulder ht, no one has ever suffered 3rd degree burns or suffered from co poisoning in the 8 years its been there, you need another hobby horse or you will ruin your relationship with all who live near you and then youll stress from that and have to move.

 

[Polly]

Hi lame.
path is not owned by extension builder, it is neighbour on the other side. I didn't think it would get signed off as does not comply with regulations, but it has. I can only assume the guidelines are only guidelines & not enforceable. Don't know

 

[Nostrum]

You need to take it up with building control, they have the final say. No point whinging on here about it as we haven't got any power to change it, and personally couldn't give a toss if you walk through a steam cloud or not.

Sorry if you take offence but reading through the thread it's obvious you have a distinct disliking to this extension as a whole and your grasping onto this flue issue like its going to ruin your life. Sometimes things change and someone else's benefits/actions can have slightly negative effect on someone else. My advise is get over it, its a bit of steam not an incinerator outlet.

 

[lame plumber]

You need to take it up with building control, they have the final say. No point whinging on here about it as we haven't got any power to change it, and personally couldn't give a toss if you walk through a steam cloud or not.

Sorry if you take offence but reading through the thread it's obvious you have a distinct disliking to this extension as a whole and your grasping onto this flue issue like its going to ruin your life. Sometimes things change and someone else's benefits/actions can have slightly negative effect on someone else. My advise is get over it, its a bit of steam not an incinerator outlet.

My apprentice!!