Servicing gas coal effect fires

[centralheatking]

The Magiglow DOES NOT normally need ANY ventilation. It is about 60% efficient. As opposed to the other one which under test conditions probably claims 20%. In a house it could even be a negative efficiency, as I think you intimidated. Those 2 fires are poles apart.

Ok firemant, please do not consider my comments as a negative
they are not at all but I would like to understand how it differs
So this magiglow ...has an open flue ? is a dfe ? probably an oxy depletion etc. It looks like an ordinary dfe so how does it differ and how is it superior ..what are its regs regarding ventilation .regards centralheatking. keen to learn here
by the way I intimated rather than intimidated subtle difference

 

[firemant]

Ok firemant, please do not consider my comments as a negative
they are not at all but I would like to understand how it differs
So this magiglow ...has an open flue ? is a dfe ? probably an oxy depletion etc. It looks like an ordinary dfe so how does it differ and how is it superior ..what are its regs regarding ventilation .regards centralheatking. keen to learn here
by the way I intimated rather than intimidated subtle difference

It actually IS very different. I am actually at a music festival (bit amateur until teatime) and am on my phone which I struggle with. Even before a days drinking. I will try to answer properly in the morning. For now, a key question when working out what you are dealing with is “can you see up the chimney?”

 

[centralheatking]

It actually IS very different. I am actually at a music festival (bit amateur until teatime) and am on my phone which I struggle with. Even before a days drinking. I will try to answer properly in the morning. For now, a key question when working out what you are dealing with is “can you see up the chimney?”

reply after the weekend...where are you at? , drink loads and enjoy
stuff us .! I would mate ...centralheatking

 

[firemant]

HallatonFest Leicestershire

3 dayer but we are driving back and forth on a shared basis.

I drive there, she.............. 🙂

 

[talktalk]

So you've effectively paid a company £140 per year for a service and break down cover even though, if the boiler broke down, Worcester would repair the boiler for free under warranty. As they offer a service on its own for £80 you've been overpaying them £60 a year for a worthless package. Not alot of money in the scheme of things but still abit of a con from the installing company.

That would work for boiler cover but the Danfoss room thermostat packed up this week and was fixed the same day under the service and repair contract which covers the whole system.