Welcome to the forum. Although you can post in any forum, the USA forum is here in case of local regs or laws
View the thread, titled "Rate of heating in a living room?" which is posted in UK Plumbers Forums on UK Plumbers Forums.
It indicates to me that a diverter is fitted but even if it isn't the rad is performing exactly as I would think it should, ie hot water moving upwards in the first few columns and then flowing downwards through all the remainingcolumns.
To recap: First test gave 56.4C/54.2C flow/return which based on rated output = 1.54kw
second test: 57.1/53C = 1.7 k
third test: 75C but return not measured but assuming 4C deltaT = 2.4kw but room took 4.5 hours to heat up from 12C to 21C
The 2Kw electric heater heated the room from 11C to 20c in 2.5 hours.
There is obviously a big difference between rad/electric tests which clearly indicates the the rad isn't emitting its rated output, if indeed its rated output is correct but difficult to imagine a manufacturer giving out "false" information.
So, all you have left is to change the TRV/lockshield and balance the rads and increase the deltaT to 15C. I
don't know if the advise is to balance just the 4 rads on that zone or not, presume, initially, yes.?
To recap: First test gave 56.4C/54.2C flow/return which based on rated output = 1.54kw
second test: 57.1/53C = 1.7 k
third test: 75C but return not measured but assuming 4C deltaT = 2.4kw but room took 4.5 hours to heat up from 12C to 21C
The 2Kw electric heater heated the room from 11C to 20c in 2.5 hours.
There is obviously a big difference between rad/electric tests which clearly indicates the the rad isn't emitting its rated output, if indeed its rated output is correct but difficult to imagine a manufacturer giving out "false" information.
So, all you have left is to change the TRV/lockshield and balance the rads and increase the deltaT to 15C. I
don't know if the advise is to balance just the 4 rads on that zone or not, presume, initially, yes.?
An update: I now have the flow pipe connected into the TRV and the return to the lockshield.
I've ascertained the order in which rads heat up on that floor. After doing, I've turned all the TRVs up full and all the lockshields closed off. Then, with the rads allowed to cool, starting with the first rad on that floor, I've opened up the lockshield as little as possible but which still allows the flow through the rad. I presume this will allow the largest temperature drop possible?
By doing so, in one room I got:
a) 58.7 C at the flow end with a 6 C drop (this is a vertical rad, but not the same brand as the vertical radiator which this thread relates to),
b) 55 C at flow end with a 15 C drop, flat panel rad
b) 55 C at flow end with a 15 C drop, flat panel rad
d) the main radiator in question: 51 C at flow end with 7 C drop
I did notice, when I checked in to look at the boiler that it was no longer switching on/off every 3 minutes any more. Actually, I didn't notice it off so I'm not sure if the cycle time has increased greatly or if wasn't switching off, I'd need to check that. Any time I looked in, it seemed to be holding steady at 62 C without fluctuation.
It didn't seem to be possible to get the 15 C temperature drop. I was being very careful to open the lockshields as little as possible whilst still allowing flow.
I've ascertained the order in which rads heat up on that floor. After doing, I've turned all the TRVs up full and all the lockshields closed off. Then, with the rads allowed to cool, starting with the first rad on that floor, I've opened up the lockshield as little as possible but which still allows the flow through the rad. I presume this will allow the largest temperature drop possible?
By doing so, in one room I got:
a) 58.7 C at the flow end with a 6 C drop (this is a vertical rad, but not the same brand as the vertical radiator which this thread relates to),
b) 55 C at flow end with a 15 C drop, flat panel rad
b) 55 C at flow end with a 15 C drop, flat panel rad
d) the main radiator in question: 51 C at flow end with 7 C drop
I did notice, when I checked in to look at the boiler that it was no longer switching on/off every 3 minutes any more. Actually, I didn't notice it off so I'm not sure if the cycle time has increased greatly or if wasn't switching off, I'd need to check that. Any time I looked in, it seemed to be holding steady at 62 C without fluctuation.
It didn't seem to be possible to get the 15 C temperature drop. I was being very careful to open the lockshields as little as possible whilst still allowing flow.
Last edited:
That is a great achievement IMO to get the boiler running continuously, at 8kw (or more), the "other" vertical rad is emitting 64% of its rated output, the two flat panel rads, 46% each of their rated output and the vertical rad in question also 46% of its rated output or 1.1 kw.
Have you established that the boiler is running continuously?, also a rough idea of the two flat panel outputs or type with dimensions.
I assume you throttled in the vertical rad lockshield to give that 7C delta?, wonder what it is with no throttling which would tell if reversing the valves does give a higher flow.
Have you established that the boiler is running continuously?, also a rough idea of the two flat panel outputs or type with dimensions.
I assume you throttled in the vertical rad lockshield to give that 7C delta?, wonder what it is with no throttling which would tell if reversing the valves does give a higher flow.
Last edited:
This is a big improvement. Need to see if your lounge feels warmer now. Why have you not balanced all the rads in your home?
If I use 60C as the inlet temperature to all the four rads and assuming that they are all rated at ~ 2.4 kw each then based on their measured deltaTs, the two vertical rads should emit 1.6 kw each and the other two 1.4 kw each giving a total of 6.0 kw which will allow the boiler to run for a reasonably long period, (based on 8kw) so the question is, is 1.6 kw sufficient for the problem room.
If you mean before now, it's because it's not something I'd ever given any thought to. I had heard the term before, but didn't really know what it was exactly until I looked it up on Youtube.
So, the other rads on that floor are:
a) the other vertical rad has 1192 watts (4071 BTU) at delta 50C
b) panel radiator - this is a 1980/90s single panel radiator size: 25" x 28" (output unknown) (64 cm x 71 cm)
c) panel radiator - this is a 1980/90s single panel radiator size: 47" x 28" (output unknown) (119 cm x 71 cm)
The boiler is running continuously usually at 62 C, sometimes up to 66 C. This is with it set to the recommended "e" setting on the boiler.
I re-ran warming the room up with the main vertical radiator in question, with an already hot boiler, beginning at a room temperature of 13 C it took 3 hrs 10 minutes to get to 20 C and a total of 3hrs 30 minutes to get to 21 C.
The lockshield is open as little as possible, just enough that I feel heat starting to arise in the TRV. I'll have to repeat my room warming experiment from a cool room again to discover that.
Last edited:
I would think that your particular model definitely modulates below 8kw in order to run continuously, more like 3 to 4kw which is good, can you post a link to it if available, also interested in this e setting as it seems distinct from ECO which only works in HW mode and stops the pre heating of the cold water.
The only way IMO to increase your vertical rad to max output is to open the lock shield valve fully and increase the boiler set point to 70/75C, you tried this previously but I think the boiler was cycling, you may then have to re balance the other rads. You could maybe live with slow heat up with the lock shield valve full open but boiler at 60C.
I came across a old Quinn radiator brochure and their column rated outputs are very similar to yours so there is no logical reason why your rad when emitting 2 kw shouldn't heat the room as fast as the 2 kw electric heater?.
The only way IMO to increase your vertical rad to max output is to open the lock shield valve fully and increase the boiler set point to 70/75C, you tried this previously but I think the boiler was cycling, you may then have to re balance the other rads. You could maybe live with slow heat up with the lock shield valve full open but boiler at 60C.
I came across a old Quinn radiator brochure and their column rated outputs are very similar to yours so there is no logical reason why your rad when emitting 2 kw shouldn't heat the room as fast as the 2 kw electric heater?.
Last edited:
Can I just check, so open lockshield fully on the rad in question only, turn boiler up to 70/75 C, then re-balance other rads if required so that their lockshields still only open as little as possible whilst still allowing flow? Once this is done, then turn set boiler temp down to 60 C?
The "e" setting is a temperature setting on the boiler. When set to "e" it means the boiler temp is ~ 60C/62C for the CH.
Last edited:
Yes, that's it basically, you may not even have to re balance the other rads, just take their deltaTs when running at 70/75, also check the vertical rad deltaT with lock shield full open at your present setting and again at 70/75C.
Its the link to your boiler that I'd like.
Its the link to your boiler that I'd like.
Greenstar i System (27kW and 30kW) | Worcester Bosch
Our higher output Greenstar i System boiler is part of that latest generation of smaller and lighter boilers. Find out more information here.
www.worcester-bosch.co.uk
In the image at the link above you'll notice there is a dial under the screen. The dial here is set to "e", which stands for "Eco".
If you increase the flow in that radiator, I can’t see how your return temperature will be low enough to condense. You will just be going round again, boiler will short cycle. You could try incrementally increasing boiler temperature though if return temps stay below 53 or so. Worcester seem very shy of stating the minimum CH output of that boiler.
I wondered if you had more radiators because you have twice said “on that floor”.
I wondered if you had more radiators because you have twice said “on that floor”.
The problems with vertical radiators is that they are size restricted, by height of room and width. They are heavy and need to be mounted safely. They are expensive. 2kw is close to max available. Then, when you think about it, the top half is heating rising air that has been already heated by the lower half, so heat transfer is lower in the upper half. Less efficiency, hotter water return temps. The exiting air flow is near to the ceiling and tends to sit there. Feel the ceiling directly above.
So either a second radiator below the window or a new window.
So either a second radiator below the window or a new window.
From what I had interpreted from Youtube clips was that the circuit would be on one floor. A different floor would be a different circuit. I could well be wrong, but that's what I had taken from it.
So when I balanced the rads, I balanced the rads on the floor of the rad in question.
Yes, I've noticed that the air nearer the ceiling is warmer.
Newer systems can have separate circuits upstairs do you have 2 thermostats?Either way, they should all have been balanced, starting with the furthest away all thermostats high so all running. Furthest away radiator may well be upstairs.
That's interesting but I don't quite follow it, if you increase the flow to the rad, the return will also increase but the rad output will also increase and the boiler output will decrease by the lost % condensing gain so the boiler will have to fire more both due to the greater rad output and to compensate for the lost condensing effect to maintain the same boiler temperature, so can't see why this should lead to cycling.
Last edited:
This is a LONG thread but if you recollect the boiler was short cycling UNTIL he wound the radiator down. Formerly it was wide open, a massive open bypass returning a high flow at near flow temp. So boiler couldn’t add enough heat to the water even at the high flows so flamed out.
Before addressing the by pass issue there is another strange issue, we know that the boiler was running continuously (with rad throtting). Even if the 4 rads were running at their rated output which I estimate at 3.15kw then the boiler would need to have a almost 10:1 turndown, even worse, my dreary calcs would indicate that with a 60C flow and the return temps as provided that the total rad demand was only 2.1 kw, I've looked up a number of links to this boiler and the "best" case I can make for it is a minimum output of 7kw, the only way that I can see this boiler running continuously is that the upstairs zone was running as well, Mossop can verify that the upstairs stat (if installed) was turned down or one way or the other that these rads were not "on".
Re: By pass.
The vertical rad running with both valves full open had a flow/return of 60/56C which will result in that rad output of 1.7kw with a flow rate of 6.1 LPM, which one might expect for any type of rad with both valves full open so a "1.7kw" boiler will run with the same deltaT of 4C but will not cycle.
the throttled number for that rad was flow/return of 60/53C to give a 1.6kw demand with a flow rate of 3.3 LPM, the "1.7kw" boiler will run with the same flow rate of 3.3 LPM but with a deltaT of 7.4C and will cycle eventually, this is also how a TRV affects boiler cycling.
I would classify a massive by pass as perhaps a wrongly set manual or automatic by pass valve installed very close to the boiler.
Obviously, the proof of the pudding is in the eating as the cycling did cease with the the throttling but in view of my first paragraph, I wonder did it coincide with the upstairs rads in service as well?
I run all my 10 rads (8 on TRV) and 2 on a roomstat with both valves fully open on all and even though I have often run on the 2 roomstat ones only it certainly doesn't cause excessive cycling IMO.
Re: By pass.
The vertical rad running with both valves full open had a flow/return of 60/56C which will result in that rad output of 1.7kw with a flow rate of 6.1 LPM, which one might expect for any type of rad with both valves full open so a "1.7kw" boiler will run with the same deltaT of 4C but will not cycle.
the throttled number for that rad was flow/return of 60/53C to give a 1.6kw demand with a flow rate of 3.3 LPM, the "1.7kw" boiler will run with the same flow rate of 3.3 LPM but with a deltaT of 7.4C and will cycle eventually, this is also how a TRV affects boiler cycling.
I would classify a massive by pass as perhaps a wrongly set manual or automatic by pass valve installed very close to the boiler.
Obviously, the proof of the pudding is in the eating as the cycling did cease with the the throttling but in view of my first paragraph, I wonder did it coincide with the upstairs rads in service as well?
I run all my 10 rads (8 on TRV) and 2 on a roomstat with both valves fully open on all and even though I have often run on the 2 roomstat ones only it certainly doesn't cause excessive cycling IMO.
When the boiler was switching on/off every 3 minutes, there were only the 4 rads on in total. After getting the connections to the main rad switched around, I also switched on some other rads on the other level.
There is no "stat" that I am aware of. I'm not entirely sure what this is. There is the boiler, the boiler handset, then all (but one) radiator have thermostatic radiator valves. You seem to be possibly referring to something else.
I've taken the readings with the boiler set to 75 C (sometimes it moved up to 77 C)
a) the main radiator in question has a 72.2 C flow with a return of 66.1 C. This is with the lockshield fully open.
b) the "other" vertical rad had a flow of 70.6 C with a return of 60.3 C.
c) the two 1980/90s single panel rads had essentially the same of 74 C flow with 59 C return.
I then re-took the temperatures of the flow/return of the main radiator in question with the lockshield open as little as possible whilst still retaining flow and the boiler still set to 75 C. I got flow of 63.8 C and return of 56.0 C
I think are the reading you were looking for John.g
Perhaps I should only have the 4 rads on when taking the readings, as I still have some rads on on the other level?
Last edited:
The other few rads are still open when I took the last measurements. I could easily take these again with these other few rads closed off again.
I need to double check that the boiler was running continuously at 75 C with both valves open in order to be 100% sure , but certainly on the various occasions I looked in at the boiler it was running continuously,
Shouldn’t be running the heating temp at 75dc
max you should do for a condensing boiler is 65 ideally lower the better
max you should do for a condensing boiler is 65 ideally lower the better
OK, the reading taken with the vertical rad throttled in might indicate that the boiler may not be running continuously as you are only getting a flow temp of 63.8C but that makes sense to me as that rad is emitting 1.7kw vs 2.4kw unthrottled.
I would suggest reducing the boiler temp to 60c again (original e setting) and reopening the vertical rad valves fully which will still give 1.7kw but only as long as the boiler is running continuously which we now know is dependent on those few other rads being on.
Or you may decide to shut them (extra rads) off and put up with a further reduced vertical rad output (due to cycling) and/or install another rad in that room. Also installing another rad may mean that you can shut off the other rads and get the heat where you really need it.
Last edited:
Yes, I have a SE (non condensing) boiler and because I have a a lot of TRVs installed that even with a boiler temp of 75C I regularly get down to a return of 40/45C, no real advantage with a SE boiler, mine runs with a fairly constant flue temp of 230C and hasn't changed much in 15 years.
There is a lot of emphasis put on getting the (HE) boiler to condense, condensing only begins at a flue gas temp of 55C so even a boiler return temp of 50C will have very little condensing benefit, you have to get down to return temps of 35/40C to get real condensing benefit, the real, easily got benefit of the condensing boiler is that it takes no effort to get down to say 75C flue temperature with a ~ 7/8% increase in boiler efficiency based on my 230C temperature, above,
Official Sponsors of Plumbers Talk
Reply to the thread, titled "Rate of heating in a living room?" which is posted in UK Plumbers Forums on Plumbers Forums.
Similar plumbing topics
We recommend City Plumbing Supplies, BES, and Plumbing Superstore for all plumbing supplies.
