DIY Gas Fitting

[Admin]

DIY Gas fitting is not recommending. This includes the installation of Gas appliances such as cookers and fires etc.

Always use a gas safe registered plumber for all your Gas plumbing requirements.

 

[mountainman]

you wouldnt be checking a non qualified persons work as they are not registered so wouldnt know!

the regs say you cannot be employed (including self) if you are not registered with gas safe. so regardless of the competence thing you MUST be registered

Correct!
End of discussion IMO.

 

[truemanufan]

To just sum up basically, if u do DIY gas installations, you are a clown! End of

 

[ManchesterGas]

You are only deemed 'competent' if you have passed ACS and are registered with Gas Safe

 

[Bernie2]

How can you know when you service a gas system who put it in? How do you know a none ACS apprentice never installed it under supervision?

Many systems over 20 years old where installed by none registered people. It is the standard of work that matter's not qualification. It is true if your paid to do a job you have to be Gas Safe registered but DIYers can still do it in their own home. If you never knew who installed the system you would never know who had done it.

Suppose a gas fitter with 30 years experience installed a system but their registration had lapsed and a three month registered gas fitter installed a system would you fail the 30 year persons system if the systems were both of the same standard?

So you would look to see if it complied with the regulations and pass it, if you never, you would have to declare every system you met ID and turn it off, because you did not know if the person who installed it was ACS or not.

Try that with a big landlord and you will probably soon find yourself out of work. The operative word is "Safe" you are employed to decide whether it is "Safe" or not, not who is qualified or not.

Why do we suppose both CORGI and GAS SAFE want to see your work even after registration and proof of qualification?
A Gas escape is not concerned with regulations but good work makes a system safer. So look at the quality not the qualification.

 

[mountainman]

Who worked on the installation previously is irrelevant.
It is currently the law that anyone who works on gas systems must be GSR. experience and competence are a bonus.

 

[Bernie2]

That is true mountainman. If you get paid for gas work you have to be registered. The operative word is paid. CORGI and Gas Safe both usually inspect your work after registration. Why would they do that if quality of work was not an issue?

If registration and qualification alone where the answer to anything would we have so many car accidents? The reason Gas Safe inspectors are probably
not all over the place inspecting work quality is cost not perhaps because they would not like to be.

Competence is a mute point, I have never asked a doctor if they are competent or asked to see their registration I just assume they are competent because they have set themselves up as a doctor.

I think in English law you have duty of care to be able to do what you say you can.
So if you work on gas you must be able to do so to meet the requirements of The Gas Regs. The blame is on you if you can't whether registered or not. It would be no use claiming "I am qualified as a defence in the case of an accident!" The accident would probably serve as proof you weren't. So quality of work is a big issue.

A bit like a well qualified baker saying "I bake lovely cakes!" How do you know unless you eat one?


That is what companies want "Good work and few if any come backs" Having practical skill knowledge in our heads is not much use to a customer if we can't turn it into real quality work.

 

[fuzzy]

Correct!
End of discussion IMO.

yes it is correct for people 'working' on gas making money. If your doing it for yourself you do not have to be registered, only competent

 

[fuzzy]

You are only deemed 'competent' if you have passed ACS and are registered with Gas Safe

why can you not be competent, passed your ACS and not registered? nothing wrong with doing that and working on your own gas

 

[fuzzy]

To just sum up basically, if u do DIY gas installations, you are a clown! End of

if your competent and do your own DIY installation whats the problem? registered or not, your not breaking any rules are you are working as safe as somebody who is registered

 

[fuzzy]

Who worked on the installation previously is irrelevant.
It is currently the law that anyone who works on gas systems must be GSR. experience and competence are a bonus.

wrong, you dont have to be GSR to work on gas

 

[Bernie2]

Yes fuzzy is right.

Lets be honest, there is nothing stopping people working on gas in their own homes now. Would it not be better if they are proven competent on a short course to recognise that?

I feel sure many ex or unemployed gas fitters would welcome that.

It would not be a case of allowing them to work for money in the full open market place, just their own home and possibly in a relations home for no money, if found to be competent?
It cuts out risk doesn't it, while it does not threaten the livelihoods of others who want to work for money to any great extent?

The idea that all of a sudden thousands of ex-gas fitters willing to work for nothing taking all the work from those that do, would appear seems silly.

And anyway they could not do that as the licence would restrict them to work on only one or two houses as named and stated on the licence. I cannot imagine that being seen as a commercial threat to anybody. It would also perhaps help clear up a grey area.

You have to go careful about what salesmen say about being GSR to promote training courses and the extent it applies.

And I do not promote none GSR working and would recommend everybody be GSR registered if they can afford it. The thing is the costs are so prohibitive that a none working individual would struggle to get back the cost layout.

That is not fair to individuals with few resources, for what is supposedly an imposed safety requirement. Lets not forget ACS are not training they are safety inspections.

Any cost regarding safety should be easily recoverable by everybody possibly by tax breaks or grants.

The likes of BS should only cost a couple of quid for a standard not the high cost they are.

Lets be honest if I said to you "You have got to work safely, but I will charge you thousands of pounds to tell you how!" you would think I was more concerned with my wallet than safety wouldn't you?

We are supposed to be keeping people safe not making a small fortune out of safety.

 

[ecowarm]

Agree with you Bernie all the way

 

[mountainman]

Don't know if this link works but have a look if it does.

[DLMURL]http://www.hse.gov.uk/press/2012/coi-e-65.htm[/DLMURL]

Ps, who's making a small fortune???

 

[fuzzy]

Don't know if this link works but have a look if it does.

[DLMURL="http://www.hse.gov.uk/press/2012/coi-e-65.htm"]Plumber jailed for carrying out illegal gas work[/DLMURL]

Ps, who's making a small fortune???

yes it is thanks, it backs up what i have been saying, to work as a gas fitter on numerous houses and claim to be registered you are working illegaly. This does not prove in any way that it is illegal to work on your own home if competent to do so

 

[mountainman]

Did you read this bit though?

HSE Inspector Edward Crick said:

"It is against the law for anyone who is not registered with Gas Safe to carry out work on a gas appliance. When unqualified workers try to bypass the law in this way they are not only putting themselves at risk of prosecution, and potentially a large fine or a spell in prison - they are also putting their customers' lives at risk.

The inspector doesn't say anything about competence or working in your own home or for friends & family being acceptable does he.
The first three lines of his statement say it all!

 

[fuzzy]

Did you read this bit though?

HSE Inspector Edward Crick said:

"It is against the law for anyone who is not registered with Gas Safe to carry out work on a gas appliance. When unqualified workers try to bypass the law in this way they are not only putting themselves at risk of prosecution, and potentially a large fine or a spell in prison - they are also putting their customers' lives at risk.

The inspector doesn't say anything about competence or working in your own home or for friends & family being acceptable does he.
The first three lines of his statement say it all!

yep, and it further strengthens what ive been saying, when working for 'customers' you must be registered, in this context i totally agree. this is different than working in your own home, the regs state quite clearly you must be competent, doesnt mention registration

 

[mountainman]

But you have ignored the first three lines of his statement which clearly state that it is against the law for a non GSR individual to work on a gas appliance.

Twenty two litte words sums up the legal viewpoint and one on which a court of law would base their case; regardless of the competency or experience of the defendant.

 

[fuzzy]

But you have ignored the first three lines of his statement which clearly state that it is against the law for a non GSR individual to work on a gas appliance.

Twenty two litte words sums up the legal viewpoint and one on which a court of law would base their case; regardless of the competency or experience of the defendant.

in this context he is right, but it doesnt affect working on your own property, this article didnt talk about somebody working on their own property. it delt with somebody earning a living from gas work without being registered, therefore in that context all that is written is correct

do you have any links to somebody being done for installing something properly in their own home when competent but not being registered?

 

[mountainman]

No I don't, but do you have any links to the contrary?

The LAW States blah blah. End of storyIMHO.

How about you settling this debate once and for all and seek definitive guidance from both the HSE and Gas Safe and publish it on this site...

 

[fuzzy]

i dont need to , they have posted the information in the regulations, its there for all to see and ive quoted here in the past.

I dont have any links to the contrary, but then again who would report the fact that somebody carried something out legally and didnt go to court?