Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Welcome to the forum. Although you can post in any forum, the USA forum is here in case of local regs or laws

Dec 18, 2018
82
11
8
Member Type
DIY or Homeowner
Hi all

Wondering if you could help with this strange issue.

I have a Vaillant ecotec 637 (set to 20kw part load) which was connected via a LLH to my system of 3 zones; DHW and 2 radiator zones. The gas usage was high and didn’t feel the boiler was modulating, so yesterday I decided to remove the LLH and just connect directly to the boiler. I noticed today with the target temp of 75, the boiler was sat around 60 after an hour and even after a few hours it’s only just about got the 70degC. Also when initial heating called for the boiler modulates down to a small flame and takes a while for it to ramp up.

This is strange as with the LLH I never had this issue and easily got the target temp and stayed there. Now I know most likely I’ll need to refit the header, but wondered why the boiler doesn’t ramp up straight away?

Thanks in advance
 
Just to add the ground floor has 10 rads and the upstairs circuit (1st and loft) has 8 rads. If both zones on, the boiler now won’t ever get to set temp and will sit around 57degc
 
Last edited:
Just checked all rads, based on deltaT50 values upstairs circuit 14.8kw and downstairs 18.7kw. We run the heating at 70-75degC and have a very uninsulated house - needs new windows and loft insulation
 
Is there a reason why boiler d0 set to partial load of 20kw when you've got a combined heating load of well over 30kw?
 
Is there a reason why boiler d0 set to partial load of 20kw when you've got a combined heating load of well over 30kw?
Hi. Most of the time only 1 zone is on. With temps dropping have started to use both radiator zones.
 
When you removed the LLH how have you reconfigured the pumps?

If configured incorrectly (pumping arrangement) it is probable that the boiler performance response is being limited by the temperature differential (high) across the heat exchanger
 
Last edited:
If any one zone or/and a number of zones are > than 20kw then the boiler will hardly reach target temp?.
The reason it was with the LLH was possibly because the secondary (rad) flow was greater than the primary flow and was diluting ( by recirculating) the boier flow to give reduced rad inlet flows = reduced rad output.
what are d.40&d.41 values now?. You will have to increase d.00, there was a good reason for installing that LLH, wonder why you thought it was causing excessive gas consumption.
 
  • Like
Reactions: b21playa
If any one zone or/and a number of zones are > than 20kw then the boiler will hardly reach target temp?.
The reason it was with the LLH was possibly because the secondary (rad) flow was greater than the primary flow and was diluting ( by recirculating) the boier flow to give reduced rad inlet flows = reduced rad output.
what are d.40&d.41 values now?. You will have to increase d.00, there was a good reason for installing that LLH, wonder why you thought it was causing excessive gas consumption.
D40/41 is 57/44.

Maybe I just put the LLH back in
 
Is the LLH removed and the boiler flow/return connected as in no LLH?.
Yes LLH totally removed and piped as if it was never there, pictures added
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4632.jpeg
    IMG_4632.jpeg
    488.7 KB · Views: 55
  • IMG_4634.jpeg
    IMG_4634.jpeg
    517.5 KB · Views: 59
Why not just increase d.00 to say 30kw??.
Downstairs circuit is say 19kw and main one used, thought 20kw would be sufficient. I was trying to reduce gas usage, wouldn’t this just increase it. Could this be the reason for slow ramp up?

Also looking at the picture, is the LLH connected right way around?
 
Last edited:
It will only increase it to the level required to give the rated output of the rads, if you increased d.00 to 30kw and reduced the boiler target temp to 57/60C then you will burn the same amount of gas as just now but you are limiting the rad output which may be fine as you will get better condensing, of course if you put another zone in service then obviously higher fuel consumption but you can't have it both ways.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: b21playa
I think so, yes.
Thank you. I see your point about increasing to 30kw and changing set point, but it will mean output to rads will be less which I don’t want. I think I’ll stick the LLH back in later. That way I know it heats up quicker and the secondary pump has a better head rate.

I was told previously that my boiler was oversized and would of been better with a 624 with d.0 set to auto
 
You have a total rad demand (2 zones on) of 33.5kw so how can a 624 service both?.
Before you reinstall that LLH, can you put the 2 zones in service with d.0 at 30kw and just take d.40&d.41.

Also remember that (probably) originally, the secondary flowrate was set up for both zones so, when one zone only in service, then the flow temperature to these rads will be greately reduced leading to reduced output but that is a "feature" of LLHs, it would be useful to install even a clamp on thermometer on the secondary flow pipe at the LLH, you can quickly determine the pump settings for both one/two zones to give optimum performance/economy.

Didn't you install this about a year ago??.
 
You have a total rad demand (2 zones on) of 33.5kw so how can a 624 service both?.
Before you reinstall that LLH, can you put the 2 zones in service with d.0 at 30kw and just take d.40&d.41.

Also remember that (probably) originally, the secondary flowrate was set up for both zones so, when one zone only in service, then the flow temperature to these rads will be greately reduced leading to reduced output but that is a "feature" of LLHs, it would be useful to install even a clamp on thermometer on the secondary flow pipe at the LLH, you can quickly determine the pump settings for both one/two zones to give optimum performance/economy.

Didn't you install this about a year ago??.
Yes I can try that, how long shall I run it before getting d.40/d.41

I have a clamp on thermometer I can check with once reinstalled.

Yes was installed last year, since then I’ve had additional rads added/replaced
 
W w w w w w,tw,ww ww,r,
Yes I can try that, how long shall I run it before getting d.40/d.41

I have a clamp on thermometer I can check with once reinstalled.

Yes was installed last year, since then I’ve had additional rads added/replaced
Run them until the flow temp is say 65C.
 
Thats interesting because (assuming a room(s) temp at 20C) that your rads are effectively "T36" which emit 65.2% of a T50 so, your rads output, 35.5*65.2%, 22.1kw which is probably why the LLH gave similar outputs with a boiler target temp of 75C but secondary temp of ~ 65C and your d0 setting of 20kw was sufficient to allow the boiler to reach its target temp of 75C.

If you didn't have that LLH to hand one wonders was one required in the first place?.
 
Thats interesting because (assuming a room(s) temp at 20C) that your rads are effectively "T36" which emit 65.2% of a T50 so, your rads output, 35.5*65.2%, 22.1kw which is probably why the LLH gave similar outputs with a boiler target temp of 75C but secondary temp of ~ 65C and your d0 setting of 20kw was sufficient to allow the boiler to reach its target temp of 75C.

If you didn't have that LLH to hand one wonders was one required in the first place?.
Hi, thanks for that.

Just to clarify where has the 35.5 come from?

Thing one of the main reasons was the loss of head in the hex of the Vaillant and needing additional pump to circulate especially to loft rooms.

I may give it until Wednesday (my next free day) to put the LLH back in and see how the next few days go. Of course one zone at a time set at 20kw
 
Last edited:
That should read 33.5kw, "Just checked all rads, based on deltaT50 values upstairs circuit 14.8kw and downstairs 18.7kw" so your total rad output was ~ 21.8kw? (33.5*65.2%).
I obviously see your point re head loss.
 
That should read 33.5kw, "Just checked all rads, based on deltaT50 values upstairs circuit 14.8kw and downstairs 18.7kw" so your total rad output was ~ 21.8kw? (33.5*65.2%).
I obviously see your point re head loss.
Thanks for clearing that up, makes sense and adds up.

Maybe that’s where the 24kw boiler made sense? I need to change the boiler at some point as something has dropped against it and damaged the casing
 
Last edited:
Well, all we know for sure is that the installed radiator output (T50) is 33.5kw, whether this is actually required at something like -10C or so is unknown except a heat loss was carried out, even if 24kw only is required and the rads are oversized, good, if weather compensation was installed which would give maximum boiler efficiency and even without it, you can manually set the boiler target temperature.
 
  • Like
Reactions: b21playa
Thanks for clearing that up, makes sense and adds up.

Well, all we know for sure is that the installed radiator output (T50) is 33.5kw, whether this is actually required at something like -10C or so is unknown except a heat loss was carried out, even if 24kw only is required and the rads are oversized, good, if weather compensation was installed which would give maximum boiler efficiency and even without it, you can manually set the boiler target temperature.
Rads are definitely oversized, the reason was to run a lower flow temp but that hasn’t happened yet….i have family members who really feel the cold (old age). No weather compensation fitted, just running hive units but have been thinking of upgrading controls but not sure which to go for. I’ve seen either Vaillant which seems expensive and can not work out exactly what I require or the other option was nest using open therm module
 
Did you ever actually measure the secondary flow temperature?, if the secondary pump which looks like a UPS3 is on PP2? setting then that can result in a very low actual head which may not have been sufficient for some rads.
 
Did you ever actually measure the secondary flow temperature?, if the secondary pump which looks like a UPS3 is on PP2? setting then that can result in a very low actual head which may not have been sufficient for some rads.
I did at some point but can not remember the value unfortunately. Yes you are correct about the pump model and setting, I took that from the manual that it was recommended to be on PP2 but that was just for 2-pipe system. What would be the ideal setting from your experience?
 
I did at some point but can not remember the value unfortunately. Yes you are correct about the pump model and setting, I took that from the manual that it was recommended to be on PP2 but that was just for 2-pipe system. What would be the ideal setting wfrom your experience?
I've never even seen a LLH but think I have a fair idea of how they work, if you need the secondary flowtemp to be the same as the primary (boiler) flowtemp then the secondary flowrate has to equal to or less than the primary flowrate so a constant pressure or constant curve (speed) may be more appropriate but there's no point in overthinking it, the temperature gauge will give the best advise IMO.
 
I've never even seen a LLH but think I have a fair idea of how they work, if you need the secondary flowtemp to be the same as the primary (boiler) flowtemp then the secondary flowrate has to equal to or less than the primary flowrate so a constant pressure or constant curve (speed) may be more appropriate but there's no point in overthinking it, the temperature gauge will give the best advise IMO.
Thanks John, much appreciated. Once I’ve fitted the LLH and get temp reading I’ll post back
 
You do realise that extra 15 degrees is wasted energy/ warming the return up so not required

Does the boiler pump manage the load eg heats all of the rads etc ?
Is 60degC the ideal flow temp?

I need to check all rads when just on boiler pump, I had checked earlier downstairs and a few in the 1st floor but not all of them and not the loft rads
 
Well ideally your return needs to be below 50 for condensing boilers to be happy and with sensor mad vaillants this is a must also with your split as it won’t reach max burn / temps unless the split and temp rise is within spec (split is the difference between flow and return ideally 20dc)
 
  • Like
Reactions: b21playa
Well ideally your return needs to be below 50 for condensing boilers to be happy and with sensor mad vaillants this is a must also with your split as it won’t reach max burn / temps unless the split and temp rise is within spec (split is the difference between flow and return ideally 20dc)
Thanks. I’ve turned down flow to 65dC and will see how that goes.

Do you have any thoughts on replacing hive controls with one that can modulate the boiler better and set different flow temps for hw/ch?
 
Thanks. I’ve turned down flow to 65dC and will see how that goes.

Do you have any thoughts on replacing hive controls with one that can modulate the boiler better and set different flow temps for hw/ch?

There brilliant and priority hot water and wc heating but you will have cooler rads then stock temp etc
 
There brilliant and priority hot water and wc heating but you will have cooler rads then stock temp etc
Thanks. Vaillant controls are a bit of a mine field, not sure exactly what I would need? Vr66 wiring centre, weather comp sensor, not sure of which thermostats for both floors and then how to incorporate a vr10 sensor for dhw temp.

Hw priority would be great, can set flow at higher temp for quicker recharge
 
Last edited:
Thanks. Vaillant controls are a bit of a mine field, not sure exactly what I would need? Vr66 wiring centre, weather comp sensor, not sure of which thermostats for both floors and then how to incorporate a vr10 sensor for dhw temp.

Hw priority would be great, can set flow at higher temp for quicker recharge
Are you thinking of not re installing the LLH?.
How are the rads performing now at 65C??, if the return is like the previous 47C then you will be getting reasonable condensing and you may be able to further reduce the target temp. Are you still just running one zone at the time with d.00 set to 20kw or both with d.00 set to 30kw or whatever?.
 
Are you thinking of not re installing the LLH?.
How are the rads performing now at 65C??, if the return is like the previous 47C then you will be getting reasonable condensing and you may be able to further reduce the target temp. Are you still just running one zone at the time with d.00 set to 20kw or both with d.00 set to 30kw or whatever?.
I’m thinking of leaving it for a bit as it is and see how it goes. Rads seem to be performing fine at 65c, don’t want to reduce anymore as cylinder heat up times will need to be increased hence the thought of changing controls for hw priority on a higher flow temp. Still running d.0 at 20kw and single zone at a time
 
  • Like
Reactions: John.g
Given how much is being being built on the assumption, I'd want to check (using a stopwatch) and the gas meter, that the power the boiler claims to be delivering to the system matches the amount of gas being consumed.
 
Re install LLH.

Move second filter from primary flow to secondary return in to LLH.

Set secondary pump to constant. You want LLH flow in/out to be the same to prevent return water mixing. Can roughly check with temp probes on all LLH connections.

Set boiler to auto, not limited.

Get a vaillant LLH sensor (ntc) and attach to LLH and boiler.

Set to 65c, ensure return is low enough to condensate.

Forget about it and spend your energy somewhere else 🙂.
 
With respect to the Header, from the photos posted, that will probably have a high parasitic flow. I would have expected to see a Header with an oversized primary flow and oversized secondary return.

The term often used is Low Loss Header, the configuration posted gives hydraulic separation, but it is unlikely to be low loss
 
Re install LLH.

Move second filter from primary flow to secondary return in to LLH.

Set secondary pump to constant. You want LLH flow in/out to be the same to prevent return water mixing. Can roughly check with temp probes on all LLH connections.

Set boiler to auto, not limited.

Get a vaillant LLH sensor (ntc) and attach to LLH and boiler.

Set to 65c, ensure return is low enough to condensate.

Forget about it and spend your energy somewhere else 🙂.
Hi

There is no filter on the primary flow, it’s a deaerator - spirotec rv2

For the pump speed do you mean constant speed or pressure?

The LLH sensor, is that the vr10 and does it need to go on primary flow on secondary flow?

Also would moving down to a 24kw boiler be ok?

Thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
With respect to the Header, from the photos posted, that will probably have a high parasitic flow. I would have expected to see a Header with an oversized primary flow and oversized secondary return.

The term often used is Low Loss Header, the configuration posted gives hydraulic separation, but it is unlikely to be low loss
Hi there

The primary and secondary flow & returns are all 28mm up the point where they branch off to the 3 zone valves down to 22mm
 
Hi

There is no filter on the primary flow, it’s a deaerator - spirotec rv2

For the pump speed do you mean constant speed or pressure?

The LLH sensor, is that the vr10 and does it need to go on primary flow on secondary flow?

Also would moving down to a 24kw boiler be ok?

Thanks in advance
NO LLH now?
Can you set d.00 to auto, and put both zones in service until fully heated up, say 30/40 minutes and with the boiler target temp at 75C, then note the flow/return temps, d.40&d.41., that will give useful info, IMO.
 
NO LLH now?
Can you set d.00 to auto, and put both zones in service until fully heated up, say 30/40 minutes and with the boiler target temp at 75C, then note the flow/return temps, d.40&d.41., that will give useful info, IMO.
Hi john

Haven’t got around to refitting LLH yet, but I’ll set to auto and report back temps

I may wait and get rgi to do it as I need to swap boiler out. The reason for the 624 was I’ve got access to a 3yr old one from a friend who’s removed it for a combi
 
I may wait and get rgi to do it as I need to swap boiler out. The reason for the 624 was I’ve got access to a 3yr old one from a friend who’s removed it for a combi
Don't assume, without checking, that a Gas Registered engineer will be willing to install a second-hand customer-supplied combi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: John.g
Hi john

Haven’t got around to refitting LLH yet, but I’ll set to auto and report back temps

I may wait and get rgi to do it as I need to swap boiler out. The reason for the 624 was I’ve got access to a 3yr old one from a friend who’s removed it for a combi
Can you just do those tests now with no LLH connected, you don't require a RGI, just change d.00 to auto, set target temp to 75c and open the two CH zone valves and then check d.40&d.41 say 15/20 minutes after the target temperature has been met.
 
Can you just do those tests now with no LLH connected, you don't require a RGI, just change d.00 to auto, set target temp to 75c and open the two CH zone valves and then check d.40&d.41 say 15/20 minutes after the target temperature has been met.
Right d.40 is 75 and d.41 is 55

All rads hot apart from loft which saw temps high as 50c flow. Not sure if this is due to height or them being old rads on 8/10mm

The rgi was referred to for changing boiler and getting him to add LLH back in
 
Don't assume, without checking, that a Gas Registered engineer will be willing to install a second-hand customer-supplied combi.
Don't assume, without checking, that a Gas Registered engineer will be willing to install a second-hand customer-supplied combi

Don't assume, without checking, that a Gas Registered engineer will be willing to install a second-hand customer-supplied comb

Don't assume, without checking, that a Gas Registered engineer will be willing to install a second-hand customer-supplied combi.
Hi

Totally agree, it would be the rgi who decommissioned it and they are happy to install. He said if he didn’t decommission it, wouldn’t install it
 
Right d.40 is 75 and d.41 is 55
All rads hot apart from loft which saw temps high as 50c flow. Not sure if this is due to height or them being old rads on 8/10mm

The rgi was referred to for changing boiler and getting him to add LLH back in
At 75C/55C you are getting 29.3kw rad output or 89.2% of your 33.5kw T50 rating, if you were to run at a flow temperature of 65C then you will get a return temperature of 49.4C with 22.81kw rad output or 68.1% of your 33.5kw T50 rating, so a 24kw boiler may be ok especially as you probably won't be running two zones together for very long periods.
 
  • Like
Reactions: b21playa
At 75C/55C you are getting 29.3kw rad output or 89.2% of your 33.5kw T50 rating, if you were to run at a flow temperature of 65C then you will get a return temperature of 49.4C with 22.81kw rad output or 68.1% of your 33.5kw T50 rating, so a 24kw boiler may be ok especially as you probably won't be running two zones together for very long periods.
Many thanks John, your help is much appreciated.

I’ll arrange for boiler to be replaced in the new year along with reinstating the LLH and taking advice from Timmy for addding a filter to the secondary return, a ntc sensor and setting pump speed to constant. Just need to work out how to wire it up and program the boiler
 
  • Like
Reactions: John.g
Let us know how you get on.

I was looking at those UPS3 PP2 curves the other day for someone else and unless I misunderstood, you said that (with LLH in service) with d.00 set to 20kw and both zones on that you were still getting the boiler target temp of 75C, we now know that the primary flowrate is ~ 22LPM so the secondary flowrate must only have been ~ 7LPM to reduce the rad output to ~20kw. I would be surprised if a secondary head of more than 3M would be required to give a (secondary) flowrate of 22LPM, the UPS3 on PP2 will almost produce that, (it will give 19.5LPM at 2.6M) so looks to me like the pump isn't working as it should (or else some fundamental LLH problem), it might be worth removing the pump head and cleaning out the pump ports and also the impeller vanes, a tie wrap is handy for this, if all clean then the pump may have developed a fault, unfortunately this and a lot of other Grundfoss pumps don't display the power in watts from which the performance can easily be derived from the pump curves, you can allways stick a energy monitor on the end of the pump cable. Anyhow, one way or the other, worth bearing in mind.
 
Let us know how you get on.

I was looking at those UPS3 PP2 curves the other day for someone else and unless I misunderstood, you said that (with LLH in service) with d.00 set to 20kw and both zones on that you were still getting the boiler target temp of 75C, we now know that the primary flowrate is ~ 22LPM so the secondary flowrate must only have been ~ 7LPM to reduce the rad output to ~20kw. I would be surprised if a secondary head of more than 3M would be required to give a (secondary) flowrate of 22LPM, the UPS3 on PP2 will almost produce that, (it will give 19.5LPM at 2.6M) so looks to me like the pump isn't working as it should (or else some fundamental LLH problem), it might be worth removing the pump head and cleaning out the pump ports and also the impeller vanes, a tie wrap is handy for this, if all clean then the pump may have developed a fault, unfortunately this and a lot of other Grundfoss pumps don't display the power in watts from which the performance can easily be derived from the pump curves, you can allways stick a energy monitor on the end of the pump cable. Anyhow, one way or the other, worth bearing in mind.
I will keep you all posted - just waiting on a date from the rgi, I’m on the cancellation list if anytime comes up.

I’ll take a look at the pump tomorrow and see if it’s blocked and not spinning freely. I wonder if it was the pipework, the flow comes out the pump and then has 2 x 90deg bends to go back on itself. There also wasn’t an air vent on the bend (highest point in that leg)

If the pump is bad, are there any better alternatives?
 
After inspection/cleaning you can then re try it with the re installed LLH, a few temperatures will then establish if its OK or not.
The 6M DAB Evosta3 is a good choice or my own (4 year old) 6M Wilo Yonos Pico with the 3 traditional CC settings plus CP and PP modes which can be incrementally changed in 0.1M steps to give almost any required flowrate. Both of these pumps display the power and the flowrate.
 
Last edited:
After inspection/cleaning you can then re try it with the re installed LLH, a few temperatures will then establish if its OK or not.
The 6M DAB Evosta3 is a good choice or my own (4 year old) 6M Wilo Yonos Pico with the 3 traditional CC settings plus CP and PP modes which can be incrementally changed in 0.1M steps to give almost any required flowrate. Both of these pumps display the power and the flowrate.
I’ll test it all before buying a new one, could be dirty, could be due to the way it was piped originally. Easy enough to change at a later date anyway
 
Re install LLH.

Move second filter from primary flow to secondary return in to LLH.

Set secondary pump to constant. You want LLH flow in/out to be the same to prevent return water mixing. Can roughly check with temp probes on all LLH connections.

Set boiler to auto, not limited.

Get a vaillant LLH sensor (ntc) and attach to LLH and boiler.

Set to 65c, ensure return is low enough to condensate.

Forget about it and spend your energy somewhere else 🙂.
Hi Timmy

Should I move the filter from the primary return to secondary return or get another one?

Thanks
 
Let us know how you get on.

I was looking at those UPS3 PP2 curves the other day for someone else and unless I misunderstood, you said that (with LLH in service) with d.00 set to 20kw and both zones on that you were still getting the boiler target temp of 75C, we now know that the primary flowrate is ~ 22LPM so the secondary flowrate must only have been ~ 7LPM to reduce the rad output to ~20kw. I would be surprised if a secondary head of more than 3M would be required to give a (secondary) flowrate of 22LPM, the UPS3 on PP2 will almost produce that, (it will give 19.5LPM at 2.6M) so looks to me like the pump isn't working as it should (or else some fundamental LLH problem), it might be worth removing the pump head and cleaning out the pump ports and also the impeller vanes, a tie wrap is handy for this, if all clean then the pump may have developed a fault, unfortunately this and a lot of other Grundfoss pumps don't display the power in watts from which the performance can easily be derived from the pump curves, you can allways stick a energy monitor on the end of the pump cable. Anyhow, one way or the other, worth bearing in mind.
Took the head off the pump today; impeller turned fine but there seemed to be some ‘end float’ which I’m not sure if it’s normal

Water colour wasn’t the best so I’ve added some cleaner and connected my twin magnacleanse
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4667.jpeg
    IMG_4667.jpeg
    364.7 KB · Views: 43
  • IMG_4668.jpeg
    IMG_4668.jpeg
    493.9 KB · Views: 76
  • IMG_4669.mov
    25.9 MB
Took the head off the pump today; impeller turned fine but there seemed to be some ‘end float’ which I’m not sure if it’s normal

Water colour wasn’t the best so I’ve added some cleaner and connected my twin magnacleanse
That looks like excessive wear on the housing where the impeller fits into??, the pump looks quite reasonably clean IMO.
If you have the time/inclination I would suggest to buy a plug in energy monitor like mine below (~ £15ish) and connect a 3 pin plug to the pump cable, connect a mains supply to the pump inlet (as long as its not > say 5bar) stick a bit of pipe on the pump discharge with a gate/lever isolating valve (or a old pump isolating valve with a bit of pipe on the end) on the end, run the pump from a extension lead at say CC1, CC2, CC3 and PP2, and measure the flowrate into a bucket with the valve throttled to give a suitable flowrate (can check that later) and note the power from the energy monitor.

img_4668-jpeg.86210
 

Attachments

  • Energy Monitor.jpg
    Energy Monitor.jpg
    158.5 KB · Views: 48

Official Sponsors of Plumbers Talk

Similar plumbing topics

We recommend City Plumbing Supplies, BES, and Plumbing Superstore for all plumbing supplies.