It certainly looks like it's screwed, alright. You know I've been a non-political labour supporter all my life. I mean it was by default. Inherited from my parents. Backed by a couple of minutes thought that said 'labour' = work = me therefore 'I am Labour'.
But now I find myself unable to comprehend what Labour governments do, here and in UK. and I find myself reading magazines like The Spectator and Quadrant and similar which, I'm told, are Liberal or Conservative or something - definitely not 'Labour' anyway.
But it is only in those magazines that I see sensible reporting and discussion.
Which ain't to say that's all I find.
I find they are often quite paranoid about 'the people', being the mass of the population, being supposedly 'Labour' supporters, being the mass on the dole, being the 'force' that they think is pushing all governments of any persuasion into the same idiot actions.
In particular they are down on what we call 'dole bludgers' in Australia - people on Social Security, sometimes whole families who've been there nearly all their lives...
And I'm sorry to see that because it is a sweeping generalisation which is always a logical falsity and it lets down the quality of their otherwise excellent appraisal of the situation.
And because I've been there, I've done that, I've been a dole bludger and I've known many of them - even there in England where I spent some time.
And what the rich or the 'middle class' or the thousands/millions of secure public servants or whatever - all those who choose to denigrate this 'dole bludging mob' don't realise is two major things: 1. It is far, far from easy to get into employment. Far from easy. And almost impossible to get into something as cushy and secure as millions of govt employees have and totally impossible to get into something as comfy and satisfying as those in the better situations have. They are urged to do it, condemned for not doing it, yet the urgers and condemners for vastly the most part never did it for themselves but rather fell into something good and easy for little effort on their own part. I've been there. Done all that. Both sides of it.
2. Those people represent 'people'. Probably represent more purely what 'people' are in the world. True people. Real people. Natural people. Non-greedy, non-pushing, non-insecure, non-driven. Accepting, happy, natural people.
Though condemned for accepting so much 'given' to them for free the fact is they've got virtually nothing, they endure severe constraints in many areas in an objective sense and subjectively this situation is exacerbated continually by the inevitable increasing disparity between the haves and have nots as our material culture constantly invents new things to have - which they can't have.
But they don't rise in revolt.
All over the world. Generally. I think they have, here and there, from time to time.
There are, I think, a number of nations that have experienced this phenomenon or something very like it. Malaya - with Chinese, Indians and Malays had the Malays the poor 'accepting' bottom class subject to the wealthy Chinese bankers and Indian businessmen. The Malays, I think (with my poor historical understanding) eventually had to rise up and remind everyone (including themselves?) that this was their country and take it back for themselves.
I think this has happened in a number of places. The indigenes are basically happy to be at home. The imports are driven by a need to prove themselves, to acquire wealth, status, position, security - to find their own way to 'be at home' - which sometimes they never reach. Instead remaining on their mad treadmill.
Well the same thing happens in a homogenous country, I think. It doesn't have to be a division amongst races, immigrants and indigenes. It can be a division between some kind of hereditary classes or even between recent, new, adopted attitudes or 'classes'.
However it happens the point is that it happens and it divides a society and it is obvious as the nose on your face that it is always assumed that the neurotic driven personality or paradigm is correct and the accepting, docile mob are lazy bludging no gooders.
But is is just not true. Rather, I think, the truth is the other way round.
Myself I always think of a litter of pigs. Ever seen one? Go look. The little buggers are so strong, incredibly strong little packets of meat from the word go. And they fight for the front tit. And the closer to the front the more milk and the bigger and stronger you get and the more milk you get and the bigger and stronger....
But we value politeness and sanity, calm and reason, orderly queuing, and stepping out of the way of the greedy pushing piglet and letting it into the front tit is more in my nature than otherwise. Mine and millions more, I think. And I would have it be universal if I could.
So I have stepped out of the way all my life. I do not compete that savagely. I have acquired. I have a degree. I have various skills/competences. I have worked in many fields, held many jobs and acquitted myself quite well in most of them. I am far from being a useless dole bludger. But I don't push and I'm not neurotically insecure and/or blind to the sheer pleasure of being alive in my country.
And during my time I have sometimes been lucky and I've gotten into a couple or so of lucky jobs, cushy jobs and I've seen how it is in there and who is in there, what kind of people, what they do and how they think. And I notice it is only moments before they accept their luck as their right and only yet a few more moments before they draw the corollary that those who don't have that luck don't have it because they have no right to it..... And so on...
And it is sad, isn't it? Because it is the masses who can offer the insecure the security they are hunting for (and which they daily grow more in need of as their fear of those masses gets awakened and nurtured by the growing critical state of the world and their own inability to understand it and fix it...) and it is those 'insecure' who can offer the masses the freedom from curtailment and constraint that they would wish for, need, desire, could well use... For, after all, they, the 'insecure', are the overlords in fact, on a daily basis (except for this idea that the masses are pushing all the programmes, all the ideas, of any government today) and it is they who are deciding how the world will be built, what will be built, etc.... they've got the steering wheel, haven't they?
Both sides should see the other side's point of view.
Meantime I can see 'whinging self centred ******* who expect everything for nothing' on both sides of the social divide, on both sides of politics.
The moderator's going to trash this for being off the point...
🙂