Tightness Test Query

[firemant]

That’s exactly what I thought. Because I had disconnected and found it to be dropping on the cooker. The permissible drop is alliances connected.

This is your response I refer to on my previous post.

 

[stratplus]

The post quoted below suggests that you DID actually do the scenario.

Whatever, once you find there is a carcass leak you cannot ignore it. Do don't do it. IMO

Carcass leak yes. Scenario is if leak is found on cooker not carcass. Can you re-connect cooker and record it, that is the scenario. And no this wasn’t anything I had done.

 

[firemant]

You really are confusing us.

So you DID find that there is an escape on the carcass, by removing the cooker?
What did you do.?

If the leak is on the cooker,then, yes you can reconnect. But, as I said, I would never have disconnected it to to test, as if the leak WAS on the carcass, then you have to leave off, with permission.

So there never is a win in disconnecting

 

[stratplus]

You really are confusing us.

So you DID find that there is an escape on the carcass, by removing the cooker?
What did you do.?

If the leak is on the cooker,then, yes you can reconnect. But, as I said, I would never have disconnected it to to test, as if the leak WAS on the carcass, then you have to leave off, with permission.

So there never is a win in disconnecting

Nevermind

 

[firemant]

Nevermind

FFS

 

[firemant]

Stratplus: I note you have disliked everyone of my posts.🙂

You have demonstrated your lack of knowledge, and that is fair enough - a forum is there to engage and help.It is better to ask than get it wrong.
But you are ducking and diving, and your untruths are confusing yourself as well as me.

I don't know how I will get through the day with all the worry about the thumbs down.