Welcome to the forum. Although you can post in any forum, the USA forum is here in case of local regs or laws

Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

B

buckley plumb

can someone tell me if the flue regs have changed . I called gas safe last year as a balanced flue was only 100mm from a door opening and was told its always been like that do a room test and fit carbon monoxide alarm and class as ntcs . someone called tonight as british gas wont pass their boiler balanced flue baxi as its 275mm from an opening window and manual says 600mm . customer asked them if he could change window for non opening frame and they said it still would not pass .
 
The manufacturer's instructions supercede all other regulations. Either gas safe were misinterpreted or wrong.
 
Natural draught needs 300mm from fabric opening of building so technically it's Ntc even if they change the window
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
can someone tell me if the flue regs have changed.

BS 5440-1:2008 is still current standard, nothing new.

And it's - Flueing and ventilation for gas appliances of rated input not exceeding 70 kW net (1st, 2nd and 3rd family gases). Specification for installation of gas appliances to chimneys and for maintenance of chimneys
 
can someone tell me if the flue regs have changed . I called gas safe last year as a balanced flue was only 100mm from a door opening and was told its always been like that do a room test and fit carbon monoxide alarm and class as ntcs . someone called tonight as british gas wont pass their boiler balanced flue baxi as its 275mm from an opening window and manual says 600mm . customer asked them if he could change window for non opening frame and they said it still would not pass .

Gas Safe were wrong, MI's are what you use. That situation is NCS anyway, so would still be allowed onto a BG contract. If it's a balanced flue boiler it must be old as heck and be shy on parts, that's probably more reason they didn't take it on.
 
Don't know what's going to happen when they do away with NTC in the near future, understand it' in the pipeline only going to be AR/ID
 
Ntc is a bloody waste of time and muddys the water imho.

Defects should be actionable or not.
This whole ntc ....'its not right but your ok to leave it but you might want to think about having it done' just gives mixed messages.

And regarding AR - IF I were in charge it would be cap the bloody lot.

Whats the real material point of Ar and id.


personally and logically id get rid of the term ID.

I would only have 1 classification of everything as AR with a new cap off policy lol

Cos if its at risk of killing you then we turn the bloody thing off anyway thats good enough for me. Lol
 
Ntc is a bloody waste of time and muddys the water imho.

Defects should be actionable or not.
This whole ntc ....'its not right but your ok to leave it but you might want to think about having it done' just gives mixed messages.

And regarding AR - IF I were in charge it would be cap the bloody lot.

Whats the real material point of Ar and id.


personally and logically id get rid of the term ID.

I would only have 1 classification of everything as AR with a new cap off policy lol

Cos if its at risk of killing you then we turn the bloody thing off anyway thats good enough for me. Lol

OMG someone's got out the wrong side of the bed this morning !! :cuss:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Ntc is a bloody waste of time and muddys the water imho.

Defects should be actionable or not.
This whole ntc ....'its not right but your ok to leave it but you might want to think about having it done' just gives mixed messages.

And regarding AR - IF I were in charge it would be cap the bloody lot.

Whats the real material point of Ar and id.


personally and logically id get rid of the term ID.

I would only have 1 classification of everything as AR with a new cap off policy lol

Cos if its at risk of killing you then we turn the bloody thing off anyway thats good enough for me. Lol

I would argue that AR is the one that's a waste of time. NCS I understand, covers installations that were put in according to the regs at the time and are safe. And ID is a given.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
Yes but my point is that

AR is at risk of killing you so we turn it off.

ID is probably gonna kill you or could and we cap it off.

Sorry but in my book AR should be enough, the risk of killing you should be enough and the minimum threshold should be set at that for capping off. And then ID becomes irrelevant. As AR encompasses ID......
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So, basically we're arguing the same point, NCS then cap off (AR, ID or whatever you want to call it) and these would be the only two categories. In complete agreement there.
 
can someone tell me if the flue regs have changed . I called gas safe last year as a balanced flue was only 100mm from a door opening and was told its always been like that do a room test and fit carbon monoxide alarm and class as ntcs . someone called tonight as british gas wont pass their boiler balanced flue baxi as its 275mm from an opening window and manual says 600mm . customer asked them if he could change window for non opening frame and they said it still would not pass .
I know for a fact that so called Engineers manager would not be very happy if found out this guy was turning away business for something like this. They will only now refuse a clear AR situation that is not practicably rectifiable on a new contract.
Don't know what's going to happen when they do away with NTC in the near future, understand it' in the pipeline only going to be AR/ID
Just going to be more or less the same but without the documentation. Will still be informing customer that not fitted to MI etc etc.
 
Jtsplumbing, it's not confirmed yet, but my understanding is that NCS will not be part of the IUP, as it's confusing customers, as it's NCS, (ie was perfectly fine when put in but not now as regs have changed, and therefore doesn't really need to be upgraded, but customer can if they want) it shouldn't be part of the IUP as it isn't unsafe, however there will still be the requirement to advise the customer that it's NCS, only AR and ID will be part of the paperwork for reporting, so in effect the only difference is the way we advise people that something is NCS, which seems fine as NCS seems to reduce the seriousness of the IUP
Newcastle Phil, I don't agree about AR & ID being the same, ID gas leak or spillage, AR corrosion on pipe that might leak later, or 90 degree bends and horizontal open flue increasing the RISK of spillage, but might never spill, so if AR we advise they don't use it just in case, if ID it must go off
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
ive said this before ar is what should go all it does is pass the responsibility from a skilled individual ,the engineer to an unskilled individual the tennant or owner managers on big service contracts love it engineer turns of tennant turns back on, buck passed
i actually prefer the term potentially dangerous
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
ive said this before ar is what should go all it does is pass the responsibility from a skilled individual ,the engineer to an unskilled individual the tennant or owner managers on big service contracts love it engineer turns of tennant turns back on, buck passed
i actually prefer the term potentially dangerous

It's not every day I agree with you Steve but you're on the money here mate.
 

Official Sponsors of Plumbers Talk

Similar plumbing topics

We recommend City Plumbing Supplies, BES, and Plumbing Superstore for all plumbing supplies.